National youth service as a culturally integrative force

Although nation-states were, in the past, frequently identified with a common language, history and culture, modern societies are increasingly multicultural. Even as they celebrate diversity and difference as sources of strength, countries around the world seek a common denominator of respect and understanding among their citizens.

The Fifth Global Conference on National Youth Service addressed the challenge of achieving social integration that respects cultural diversity. Conference participants learned about models of NYS as a force for social integration in both developed and developing countries and explored questions of service outside of one's community of origin, exposure to different cultures and languages, and service in mixed groups. The plenary discussion identified potential conflicts between values of integration and fears of assimilation. Participants in the plenary discussion examined the collective rights of minorities to remain separate from the broader society in light of the civic responsibilities of individuals to participate fully in their society.

Here follows a summary of the conference session cultural integration.

Keynote speaker, Jean-Guy Bigeau, Canada

The Canadian Experience

Canada is a country built by many cultures including those of the Aboriginal Nations, the English, French and other European colonists. In 1985 the Canadian Government enacted the Multiculturalism Act. This Act aimed to encourage civic duty and participation, as well as - most relevant for our purposes - promoting cultural integration. In the Multiculturalism Act we see an acknowledgement of the advantages to social justice and civic participation in promoting social integration.

Limits to Integration

It is of course important to note the limitations of integration. Many countries benefit from the presence of reasonably distinct cultural communities. Complete assimilation of individuals into a predetermined set of values does not always provide the incentive for these individuals to contribute actively to the development and growth of society. Social recognition and acceptance of different cultures can be powerful tools that provide the opportunity and incentive for every individual in society to become an active citizen.

Katimavik Program

Katimavik (the Inuit word for 'meeting place') is a National program that provides training and volunteer services to young Canadians. Since 1977, with a break in 1985 when the program was abolished and then renewed, more than 20,000 participants have taken part in the program. Katimavik volunteers serve in Canadian communities, carrying out useful work projects that could not be completed without volunteer assistance. Groups work in a number of different communities, in French-speaking, English speaking, rural and urban settings.

Katimavik volunteer groups are diverse. As well as socio-economic differences, participants in each group are also from different linguistic backgrounds, with two-thirds native English speakers and one-third native French speakers.

Building an Integrative Program

Katimavik is a successful program with a number of features that can be transferred to other settings. A number of these features stem from the realization that National Youth Service programs involve education as well as service. Katimavik uses partners to provide work related training to volunteers, not just to improve their work, but also their understanding and skills. Language instruction (groups are bi-lingual) is another form of training, even more closely related to cultural integration.

Values education is important, and treated as such, within Katimavik. Katimavik is pro-active in creating a culture of diversity within its groups, thus impacting upon the values of participants who live within these groups. This respect of diversity allows participants to grow to know and like themselves and others.

A good way to create a sense of togetherness amongst young people is to have them work on a common project. Participants in Katimavik groups work together on activities where they can achieve shared objectives. Although at first there are often difficulties caused by the diversity of the group when faced with a difficult task, eventually this type of approach tends to strengthen the links uniting them. It also takes attention away from their differences. Furthermore, with a choice of projects reflecting their collective interests, young people discover that they have fundamentally similar fears and dreams.

General Benefits to Youth

Although strictly speaking beyond the scope of this paper, it is worth listing briefly the benefits to young people of participating in a Youth Service program such as Katimavik's. Apart from the social integrative effects that will be examined below, there are three kinds of ways in which these young people develop: in skills, in knowledge and in values.

In terms of skills, young people improve their language, computer, vocational, and decision-making abilities. In terms of knowledge, young people become more politically aware, have greater understanding of their country's problems, and deeper comprehension of social differences. Young people's values change in terms of their attitudes to education, the work place, relationships, volunteering and service.

Benefits of Integration

Having outlined the Canadian situation and the work of Katimavik, and seen how National Youth Service can help young people who serve, we now turn to our main question: how does National Youth Service serve as a socially integrative force?

The first way in which Katimavik encourages social integration is on the direct level of the group. By living together as a group for seven to nine months, participants from diverse backgrounds confront a range of different customs, opinions, and perceptions. In time, regardless of the differences amongst them, individuals come to gain a deeper understanding of cultural diversities, helping to develop a greater tolerance. Confronting young people with different cultures can also lead to a greater self confidence and self knowledge, from having to explore their identities with reference to the Other. In this context, 94% of Katimavik participants feel that they have a good understanding of Canadian cultural diversity.

Not only do participants in Katimavik's program come to understand each other better, they also become friends with one another. As the program evolves, they grow closer, and begin to create a multicultural social network across the country. This social network tends to promote a set of common values, helping social integration.

In addition to the social networks that form among young people, social ties are also made to members of the host communities. Each Katimavik group stays in two English speaking communities and one French speaking community. Over the course of the program, participants are billeted into families from the host communities for a two week period. Placement with families is carried out by a local program committee, but also only happens after face-to-face contact has been made. This placement is an important element of enrichment; this part of the program helps develop a reciprocal knowledge between host and participant, and creates long lasting personal relationships. Here the greater understanding and tolerance that exists within a group of young people is spread to members of the host community.

Returning to their community of origin, young Canadians who have participated in Katimavik programs speak positively of their experience and inform their peers about other parts of the country and the people living there, thus helping to dispel prejudice and predetermined notions.

Finally, it is worth noting that Katimavik participants contribute to the economic and cultural health of the communities they visit, again, perhaps, helping the integrative process.

Conclusion

We can see that National Youth Service schemes have the potential to lead to social integration in a number of ways: by changing the views of participants and those they come into contact with, by building inter-cultural friendships, and by contributing to the attractive development of society as a whole. To conclude, according to a young Katimavik participant, working and living with a group in British Columbia - Western Canada:

"These programs bring together young people from various parts of the country and the world to share an experience, which is new and unique to each of them... Language, religion, and all other traditional barriers are broken as the groups grow and create their own cultures to integrate various parts from each individual."

(Hina Zaidi- Montreal, Quebec).

Keynote speaker, Brig-Gen. Kola Ogunkoya, Nigeria


The Nigerian Experience

The Nigerian National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) was established three years after the bloody civil war of 1966-70. Nigeria is a large country, with an ethnically diverse population. 374 ethnic groups with three major languages and around 250 dialects make national unification a difficult task - one that the National Youth Service Corps was expressly set up to accomplish.

The NYSC is essentially compulsory for graduates of university first degrees and polytechnic Higher National Diploma Certificate courses, provided they are under 30 years old. Those graduates who do not participate in the scheme are consequently prevented from working. However it is not at all clear that the compulsory nature of the scheme is what determines such a high rate of participation - when the Nigerian Government considered lowering the maximum age of participants to 25, there were demonstrations against the move.

The National Youth Service Corps started in 1973 with 2,460 participants from five tertiary institutions. Twenty-seven years later it has grown to a size of around 100,000 participants (although this figure varies year by year) from 105 institutions. The NYSC is not only a large scheme, but is also well supported, and is now the longest running inter-state program in Nigeria.

The National Youth Service Corps members serve for a year in groups of mixed ethnic background. Service is in an area outside of a participant's own state, and in a different linguistic community. Social and cultural integration comes not only from interaction within the group of ethnically diverse participants, but also from interaction with the host community during the eleven-month placement period.

The year long program starts with a one-month orientation and training course. Participants live in a State Camp and are initiated into the philosophy and rationale of the course. They learn leadership skills, and participate in military drills in order to ensure that they are well equipped to cope with the potential difficulties they might face during their placements. The training camps work with groups of mixed ethnicity, thereby serving as the start of the social integration process. During the training camp, members of the NYSC from different geographic, linguistic, social, and cultural backgrounds get used to one another; they cook together, hold meetings together, and learn to tolerate one another's beliefs, cultures, and general way of life. Importantly, this process is not left to chance; rather a program of activities such as games, lectures, traditional dances, and even cooking competitions ensure interaction amongst participants. One of the key indicators used to measure the success of the scheme is the number of inter-ethnic marriages that occur. Many of those inter-ethnic marriages that do occur are traced back to this initial orientation and training course.

For the bulk of the main eleven months of the year, Corps members are posted around the country to work in their Primary Assignment. Where possible, work is matched to the members' area of expertise. During this period, scheme members are paid a stipend but not a salary. The NYSC members' activity contributes to public life and economic growth, helping the communities within which they work.

More directly designed to help host communities are the Community Development Service (CDS) program and the Integrated Rural Development (IRD) program. The CDS program asks Corps members to improve their host community in some way. Corps members generally participate in rural development projects such as road construction, public building schemes, running or teaching adult literacy or other classes, health campaigns, refuse disposal services, or even public art projects.

The IRD program is currently in its pilot stage. This scheme, instead of focusing on public development programs, is more closely targeted with its goal of the alleviating and preventing poverty. The IRD program includes food hygiene work, mass literacy programs, the setting up of small rural industries, and alternative technology work - such as the building of solar power generators.

Both the CDS and IRD programs ensure that NYSC members are kept active and occupied, and that, in addition to the social interaction that they have with each other and their host communities, they make a significant contribution to their host community. This encourages social integration by changing attitudes - of the host community who see the positive work Corps members do for them, and of the participants, who come to empathize with the problems and needs of their hosts.

Award schemes and competitions are common throughout the NYSC program, and these help to ensure that participation is active and energetic. Awards are given to the best volunteers from each state, depending upon their contribution, and winners usually receive the guarantee of employment and some prize. Host communities also offer awards to successful Corps members by bestowing traditional titles upon those who make the most noticeable contribution.

Competition is also used at the team level. Corps members compete in football, volleyball, dancing, and drama competitions, with teams selected from within the ethnically mixed groups. The teams compete at different levels - including inter-platoon, inter-state, and inter-zonal (around six states comprise a zone) competitions. States draw pride and pleasure from their team's performances, despite their cheering for a group that is not originally from their own state. The competitors and fellow Corps members are unified by the competition, although they too are from different ethnic backgrounds.

The NYS Corps, whilst having an almost completely national focus - with the integration that is sought an intra-Nigerian one - does contribute to West African society too. Managers of the NYSC scheme are sent to other countries, where they lend valuable expertise.

The NYSC program is considered a success within Nigeria. It is well known, and has affected a lot of people who occupy positions of power. Most high-level Civil Servants, for example, have participated in the scheme. By focusing on university and polytechnic graduates, the Corps impacts upon future opinion formers and policy makers within Nigeria.

The chosen measures of success for the NYSC are those most directly indicative of an integrative effect - inter-tribal marriage and participant relocation. These indicators, which are readily measured, give an idea of how much progress towards social integration can be made with a well-designed NYS program. Inter-tribal marriage, which would once have seemed strange, is increasingly common. Around a quarter of Corps members remain in the area of their Primary Assignment after it has finished.

We can see that the Nigerian National Youth Service Corps program contributes to the breakdown of geographical segregation, tribal exclusivity, and negative attitudes towards people of a different ethnicity. This achievement relies on built-in ethnic integration, meaningful and plentiful activities and work projects, and a healthy measure of personal and team competition. The success of the NYSC is such that it is said in Nigeria to be the 'fulcrum upon which our national unity balances.'

Comments from General Discussion

* Integration is conceptually problematic. It is far from clear that integration is desirable, when this has the connotation of assimilation of smaller ethnic groups and minority cultures into the national norm. Programs must be designed to promote tolerance and mutual respect, thereby allowing participants from minority cultures to maintain their own cultural identity.

* Integration into the national polity might well be desirable, but it remains important for a wider view to be taken. Especially with increasing globalization, it is important that young people be encouraged to feel as if they belong not only to a nation, but also to the international community. Service need not be given exclusively within a participant's home country. Work within the field of human rights, or economic development, could be performed by mixed groups from one country, or even international groups. There could be benefits to participants and their countries of origin if skills needed in the global marketplace - such as the use of English - were developed.

* Dialogue between young people from different backgrounds is unlikely, as of itself, to achieve the desired integrative results. Programs should be built around service, with participants attempting to accomplish difficult, yet socially useful, tasks together. This process brings young people together in pursuit of a common goal, whereas dialogue can sometimes serve to magnify differences. Dialogue will be more successful when used to enrich joint work programs.

* Inter-ethnic marriage might not be as good an indicator of integration, or of the integrative effects of programs, as has been claimed. Bosnia and Serbia had high rates of intermarriage before the conflict there began.

* NYS takes place within a wider political context, and political support is essential. It is important that NYS programs are not used as assimilative tools by governments.

* In order to succeed in integrating young people into society, and building a new level of tolerance and respect within society, NYS programs need to be designed with an awareness of the integrative process. Time must be built into the program for participants to reflect upon their attitudes and experiences, and supervisors need to be able to intervene in the non-formal educational process if the desired effects are not observed.

* Although it is preferable to break down ethnic boundaries by forming ethnically mixed participant groups and having young people serve ethnic communities other than their own, this is not always possible. It is better to have young people serving their own community in homogenous groups than for them not to participate in NYS at all. Over time a program such as this might well develop into a socially integrative one.

* NYS can contribute not only to cultural integration but also to the depth and strength of a national culture. The Russian experience demonstrates how this is done: by interaction with older members of society. NYS participants visit older people and offer them help with household tasks. They also probe them about the past in Russia - a country with a volatile history - about folk customs, the local past and so forth. This activity builds knowledge of the national culture, preserves the national culture, and helps to build pride in a shared history.

Evaluation Comments

"I believe the concept of 'cultural integration' should be revised (or reviewed). What do we want to "integrate"? This is very particular for each country"

"Some friends, especially from Israel, had a problem with the word integration - one religion integrating into another? But they were satisfied with the idea of integrating into the human family"

"Very informative, but only scratched the surface. More work need on the issue of collective identity"